The General Practitioner, circa 1865
Medical practice
well into the latter part of the 19th Century offered very little
by way of diagnosis or treatment. Even though many important discoveries
in physiology, pathology and microbiology were occurring during
this period, their application in general practice was not particularly
widespread. Consequently, the public had divergent opinions of
the physician. Some people considered them "quacks" and
potentially harmful to those they treated. Others respected physician
opinions and methods of treatment and sought them out.
Since money and goods were exchanged
for services, practitioners became somewhat competitive and often
allowed patients to dictate their own treatment in order to keep
them satisfied.
Medical education varied considerably and few cities or states had licensure
requirements. Some practitioners were entirely self-taught or simply self-proclaimed.
Others undertook preceptorships with established physicians or attended medical
schools.
Most medical
schools of the era were proprietary, and in order to compete for
students they kept their curriculum short. The academic year was
frequently only two to four months long and degrees were offered
after only one or two years. When some schools sought to expand
their courses to accommodate the mounting scientific discoveries,
they experienced a decrease in enrollment, losing students to schools
that offered degrees in less time.
Toward the latter part of the century,
more uniform educational and licensure requirements began forcing
out proprietary schools and university-based schools began to evolve.
Although the American Medical Association was established in 1847,
it did not become an effective force in advocating improved medical
education until the end of the century.
General practitioners of this era rarely had offices based in commercial buildings.
Most practiced from their homes with single rooms for patient evaluation and
treatment, while the majority of the time was spent traveling to patients'
homes to render services at the bedside.
Those who accepted
physicians generally considered them knowledgeable and a friend
to the family.
The general practitioners had few scientific
treatments to offer their patients. The basic premise of illness
was that, regardless of its nature, the "poisons" or "bad
humors" had to be extracted from the body. Acceptable methods
of accomplishing this included bloodletting, by venous transection
or applying leaches, blistering, sweating, inducing vomiting, using
cathartics and occasionally allowing the patient outside to breathe
fresh air.
The physician mixed chemicals with his
mortar and pestle but, with the exception of emetics and cathartics,
few were effective. Another notable exception was the use of foxglove
(for its digitalis effect) to treat heart failure, known then as
dropsy.
Diagnostically,
the physician had few pieces of equipment in his armamentarium.
The microscope reached medicine in the 1840's and was used to look
at blood samples to determine anemia and at urine samples for any
evidence of "pus."
Once determined,
little could be done therapeutically. Feeling the patient for fever
was considered important. The medical thermometer was invented
in 1867 and it allowed physicians to determine if a patient was
truly febrile, which by then had become known as a hallmark of
inflammation. Again, however, once determined, little could be
done to help the patient. A good physician palpated the patient's
pulse but what information was gained had no treatment modality
to go along with it. In 1816, Laennec invented the stethoscope.
Most general practitioners had one as part of their equipment,
and used it to osculate the chest. It added some to diagnostics,
but little to treatment.
I have chosen
1865 as the year for Anne Crawford's depiction of the General Practitioner.
It was a time when the actual practice of medicine was still relatively
primitive. Several discoveries in physiology and the pathology
of disease were advancing the science of medicine but not its ability
to treat patients.
The physician
in the rendering is doing one of the few diagnostic modalities
he knows - taking the patient's pulse. On the table to the right
are the instruments of his practice: a Laennec stethoscope, a knife
and a large brass bowl for bleeding, a small glass and brass cup
for blistering. He has a variety of chemicals and a mortar and
pestle for mixing them. To the left are his medical books and a
microscope. Since he is examining a female, it was appropriate
for the time to have a female assistant present.
|